Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Slides on Lasers & Holography

Some slides on lasers from Dr. Kung, and some slides on holography from Prof. Hewitt at Dalhousie University, for your final-exam-studying enjoyment.


(Info on the final will follow very soon. For now, assume it will be a linear combination of the first two exams, roughly twice the length of either.)

This week's lab: spectra

Here you go, something a little bit lighter* for dead week. Our 6th and final lab.

As a reminder, you need to turn in 4 reports for the 6 labs. They are due by the final exam time, and there is not much time left to procrastinate at this point.

(Some of you have turned in lab reports but your lab partners did not. Remind each other about these things.)

*haha

Monday, April 25, 2011

Optics exam 2 solutions

Here you go. Exam 1 solutions to follow soon ...

For Tuesday, group B will have a lab (which I will post this evening) and group A will have a lecture. On Thursday, reverse.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

This week

Sorry, I just realized that I inadvertently swapped next week's lectures and this week's. So, we'll talk about holography this week and fiber optics next week.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Exam 2 grades

I've just emailed all of you your exam 2 grades. Apologies for the form letter, but even with a small class this is a tedious task ... if you didn't get a grade emailed to you, let me know.

Overall, it came out well - the average was about 82%, and I think most of you will be relatively happy. The average of the first two exams is about 73%, and in particular many of you that didn't do so well on the first one showed significant improvement. Almost everyone improved, some of you by significant amounts. At this point, we will have to decide if, based on the average exam 1 & 2 scores, any scaling is necessary.

Anyway: well done! Solutions to exams 1 & 2 will show up soon so you can use them to study for the final. Since there is not much new material covered between exam 2 and the final, exam 1 + exam 2 gives you a good idea of what to expect for the final.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Tuesday 19 April

Tuesday, group B will have a lab (procedure) and group A will hear all about fiber optics.

Lab reports

Remember that you need to turn in reports on 4 of the 6 lab experiments for the semester. So far, I've been very happy with the lab reports you've turned in, but I worry that you're going to put the remaining ones off a bit too long ... there is not much time left in the semester.

This is just your friendly reminder that it is that time of the semester again, the time when we all wish we had not put things off :-)

Also, I should point out more clearly that our last few labs followed an inquiry-based method. That is fancy talk for when the professor doesn't quite know what will happen either, and the whole point of the thing is to try and figure something out given the resources you have. As a result, your results for the last several labs may not be as straightforward as you might like, and that is ok! If you did your measurements correctly, analyzed the data the best you could, just do the best you can to explain what happened. It may not fit the nice formulas in the book, and that is partly the point - why didn't it work out? Perhaps the intensity variation within your laser beam illuminated some slits less than others, and your intensity measurements are therefore screwy. Perhaps your gratings are not so simply constructed as the textbook imagines. Could be anything, but if you were careful enough, you can rule out a good many possibilities. Real sciencing is messy and difficult. We're not baking cakes here, and there is no recipe for making it come out perfectly.

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Physics extra credit exam

The major field test listed below can get you some extra credit in optics class. Here's how it works:
  • +2.5% for attending
  • variable extra credit up to +2.5% based on your performance (based on national percentile rank, not raw score)
Details:
    The Dept. of Physics & Astronomy would like all Sophomore,
    Junior & Senior Physics majors to take the Physics Major Field
    Test (MFT) in 2.5 weeks:

    ** Monday 25 April in 203 Gallalee **

    This is an annual event in our program that helps us evaluate
    the strengths and weaknesses of our teaching.

    You may _START_ the exam any time between

    **  3:00-4:00pm    **

    You are allowed 2 hours for the exam.

    ** PLEASE E-MAIL me, Ray White   rwhite@ua.edu     **
    ** AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IF YOU PLAN TO TAKE THIS EXAM.  **

    This exam is an extra credit opportunity for all 200-, 300-,
    & 400-level physics & astronomy courses this semester
    (in some courses, it may be a required component).

    We will also offer a 8GB flash drive to all students who
    participate, as well as free drinks and munchies. Additional
    awards will be given to the top sophomore, junior, senior scorers.

    The Physics MFT is online, consists of 70 multiple-choice
    questions, with immediate grading.  Only correct answers are
    scored, and there is NO PENALTY for omissions or wrong answers.

    We will provide scratch notebooks for you to use (which we will
    collect when you are done) and calculators are NOT allowed.

    Students may view sample questions online at www.ets.org:
    http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/MFT/pdf/mft_samp_questions_physics.pdf

    We appreciate your help in finding where we can improve our teaching !!

    If you have any questions, please contact: Ray White, Physics & Astronomy Chair

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011

    Cramming

    If you feel the need, some relevant sample exercises:

    Lasers: know the types, know the physical requirements for a system to exhibit lasing, know the rate equations. See the notes I posted for some of this, as well as your own notes from the lectures (that you obviously attended, seeing as this stuff is on the exam, right?).

    Geometric optics: uh, lenses. And mirrors. There is not much more to it.

    Interference: know HW5 well, 9.18, 9.24. Know how to solve the 2 slit or 2 antenna problem cold.

    Diffraction: 10.3,4,10,26,27,33,41 (some of these are very short)

    I'm not suggesting you do all of these in the next 10.5 hours before the exam, but if you glance at them and quickly review the ones you aren't sure of, you would be quite clever.

    Lastly, prepare your formula sheet well, since there isn't one on the exam. Actually, there are only a small handful of equations required if you have your wits about you. The rest is math.

    Last-minute help

    You can find some my notes on lasers from PH253 here. You may want to skim the 'identical particles and statistics' notes for background on the introduction if you're curious, but the core laser stuff starts on around page 7 and is pretty self-contained.

    This is not exactly what Dr. Kung covered, but probably close enough for some last-minute cramming ...

    Coming shortly: suggested problems to look over at the last minute.

    Monday, April 11, 2011

    This week

    Tomorrow (Tuesday):
    - Group B has a lecture (lasers 2)
    - Group A has a lab (interference)

    Thursday is exam #2 day (UPDATED):
    - Same format as last exam, same rules. Solve 5 of the 6 problems, but this time we'll treat the 6th one as bonus credit if you do all 6.
    - 3 of the problems will be: 1 general laser concepts (essay question), 1 more quantitative laser concepts (less essay), 1 geometrical optics (ray tracing type, potentially using formulas). For these, review laser lectures and last exam.
    - 3 other problems will be on interference and diffraction. The interference & diffraction questions will be confined to material we covered in lecture. Possible topics include: variants on the double slit, thin film interference, superposition of oscillators/antennas, diffraction gratings, and rectangular or other simple apertures.

    Wednesday, April 6, 2011

    Tomorrow

    Group A: lecture (lasers 2)
    Group B: lab (few slit interference)

    There is no procedure for the lab. You will be coming up with the procedure as part of the lab ... but it will be fairly obvious what you need to do!

    Thursday, March 31, 2011

    Lab 3: diffraction

    In lab 3, you will verify the position and intensity of the maxima of a laser beam passed through a diffraction grating. How you do this is fairly open ended, though I will guide you along the way and have written up some suggestions and guidelines.

    If it is not possible to finish this lab in one session, we can continue it at the start of lab 4, which will be closely related anyway.

    Wednesday, March 30, 2011

    Updated schedule

    We've decided to push Exam II back another week, to 14 April. The rest of the semester looks like this:

    31 Mar Lasers 1 (A)    Lab 3: diffraction (B)   
    5 April Lasers 1 (B)    Lab 3: diffraction (A)   
    7 April Lasers 2 (A)    Lab 4: interferometry (B)   
    12 April Lasers 2 (B)    Lab 4: interferometry (A)  
    14 April EXAM 2           
    19 April Fiber optics (A)    Lab 5: optical devices (B)   
    21 April Fiber optics (B)    Lab 5: optical devices (A)   
    26 April Holography (A)    Lab 6: spectral composition of light (B)   
    28 April Holography (A)    Lab 6: spectral composition of light (A)   

    Long story short: one more week before the exam, and on Thursday group A has lecture and group B has a lab.

    I'll update the google calendar soon.

    Monday, March 28, 2011

    Updated HW2 solutions

    In grading HW2, I found that a few of you had clever solutions to problem 8 different than what I posted earlier. I've updated the solutions to include them.

    HW5 solutions

    HW 5 solutions are out. Let me know if you find any serious errors.

    Thanks to Mr. Murray and Mr. Dykes for solving the bonus problem on #1a - I had actually not worked it out myself (I used Wolfram), so I incorporated your results in the solutions. And, thanks to Mr. Lukens for asking the question that made me remember to double my results for 1b ...

    Wednesday, March 23, 2011

    Bonus on HW 5

    In going over problem 1 on homework 5, I asserted (via Wolfram Alpha) that solving the equation

    $ n\lambda = d^\prime - d =  \sqrt{\left(x+h\right)^2 + R^2} - \sqrt{\left(x-h\right)^2 + R^2}$

    for x resulted in

    $x = n\lambda\sqrt{\frac{4R^2+4h^2-\lambda^2n^2}{16h^2-4\lambda^2n^2}} \label{eq:alpha}$

    If you can prove this with pencil and paper, showing all your steps, I'll give you 50% bonus credit on question 1 of homework 5. Include your work and a note indicating that you'd like to be considered for the bonus credit.

    Tuesday, March 22, 2011

    sub-wavelength optical microscopy

    Neat, neat stuff. Hopefully we can get in to some stuff like this toward the end of the semester.

    Lab Reports

    I am behind on grading lab reports (and everything else) you may have noticed. What I can say is that all the reports I've gotten so far have been excellent, and you have no need to worry. I doubt any of them is below a mid B, so keep doing what you're doing ...

    Some guidelines on the expectations. For the ~60min labs we do, I would expect a report of ~5 pages including a reasonable number of figures. Length is not as critical as completeness: if you can be concise, that is not a problem. I'd expect the following sections, with weighting for grading noted:

    Theory & motivation 30%
    Methods & data 40%
    Analysis, discussion, conclusions 20%
    Presentation & style 10%

    Theory and motivation means why are you doing this experiment (what will you try to learn), and how did you model/analyze your setup mathematically. Methods and data means describing what you did and reporting raw data with some estimation of uncertainty (even if the uncertainty is only noted qualitatively). Analysis, discussion, and conclusions means extracting interesting parameters from your data, comparing them with the model you proposed in the first section, and discussing the implications for the model you used (is it right, within what accuracy?). Style is just what it sounds like ... that's grammar, formatting, quality of writing, and the rest of it.

    Basically, what you have been doing is fine so far. Hopefully this will help you write up the remaining experiments.

    Last: lab reports are due at the end of the semester before the final examination period.

    Tuesday's lecture

    Tuesday, you will get your exams back. Based on how they went and a few other factors, tomorrow we'll spend most our time solving exam problems and going over the current homework problems. We'll not cover much new material (other than what is relevant to the homework), and move on to diffraction on Thursday.

    Part of the reason I'm skipping over some of the chapter on interference is that most of the last half is just straightforward applications of what we did already - superimposing two sources in, say, a Michelson interferometer and figuring out the interference condition from the geometry. Ditto for antireflective coatings, for the most part. So, we'll not cover a lot of that material in class, it will be up to you to read about those applications on your own. All you really need beyond what we've covered is more geometry, and accounting for the refractive index changing at an interface.

    The gist of this is that if you (a) feel fine about the exam, (b) have done the homework already, and (c) will actually read the chapter, you won't miss much tomorrow. Thursday we start diffraction, which is also really more of the same, modulo a semantic argument I will mock briefly. ;-)

    Thursday, March 10, 2011

    Today

    Just to be clear - we're having a lecture. The lab I speak of is a take-home experiment you do on your own (i.e., at home); I'll give you the parts for that today.

    Wednesday, March 9, 2011

    HW5 is out

    Here you go. Due March 25, the end of the week after spring break. There are 10 questions in total: 8 problems, and two short take-home experiments in which you will investigate thin film interference.

    The procedure for the experiments you can find here. You will need a plano-convex lens and two glass slides, which I will provide in Thursday's (10 March) lecture. If you are not at that lecture, arrange to meet me at another time to get your components. Of course, you may feel free to use any stray plano-convex lenses you have lying around; the longer the focal length the better. ;-)

    The experiments are quite simple, and almost purely qualitative, but I think quite illustrative and a bit of fun. There are a lot more things that can be done beyond what is in the procedure, so be creative and see what you can figure out. Both of them together should take no more than an 30-60 min, depending on your level of curiosity.

    UPDATE - if you'd rather pick up your components sooner, I'll be in my Bevill office until about 2:30 today.

    UPDATE 2 - small typo in the figure in problem 1. The lateral distance should be "R" not "8m." The height is still 8m. File has been reposted with the same name.

    Tuesday, March 8, 2011

    This week's schedule

    This week, we'll start chapter 9 on interference. That will consume both lectures this week, as well as the first one after Spring Break.

    Tuesday, we'll cover most of 9.1-9.3 (general remarks on superposition, the double slit experiment, and a bit on antennas), though I will follow a slightly different (but equivalent) approach to that used in the text. The main idea is that I'll add a few bits the book doesn't cover, and vice-versa, so between the lecture & reading you should come out ahead. You'll also get some HW back ...

    Thursday, the plan is to cover superposition of an array of sources along with various amplitude-splitting interferometers (e.g., Michelson, Fabry–Pérot; 9.4-6, mostly). After the break, we'll finish it up and go into some applications of interferometry (e.g., spectroscopy). After that, it is on to diffraction, which is really more of the same.

    The exams may be graded by Thursday. Dr. Kung and I each made up several problems for the exam, and we are first each grading our own problems, then reviewing the whole thing for consistency. There will be partial credit, and we will be as gentle as we can ... based on the collective results of the exam, I may spend some time after the break reviewing if we think there are areas that warrant it.

    Lastly, I will also post some more formal guidelines for lab reports soon. I've spoken to most of you informally about it, and the reports I've received so far have been very good - so keep doing what you're doing if you've already turned in a report or two.

    Wednesday, March 2, 2011

    Exam 1 is TOMORROW

    Exam 1 is tomorrow, Thursday, March 2 during the normal class period. The rules are basically thus:

    • You can bring in one sheet of normal 8.5x11in paper front & back, or two sheets using one side only on each. On this sheet can be anything you like - formulas, notes, etc.
    • Exotic formulas required for specific problems will be provided.
    • There will be 6 problems of equal weight, you choose any 5 to solve. You will not get more credit for doing all 6. You must pick the 5 you want graded.
    • The exam covers everything we have done in lecture thusfar.
    It won't be so bad. Keep in mind that we bother to write up notes on a particular subject, that stuff is probably important.

    Thursday, February 24, 2011

    Hwk #4 is out

    Homework #4 is out. Check your email. If you do not see it, please email me.

    Monday, February 21, 2011

    Schedule for Tomorrow

    UPDATE: had it backwards

    Reminder: group A has lab tomorrow in 322 Gallalee, group B has lecture in 311 Houser.

    Roles reversed on Thursday ...

    Tuesday, February 15, 2011

    Polarization & Jones Calculus

    UPDATE: Quite a bit added on how to write down the Jones vectors for different polarization states and combine them.

    This went by pretty quickly today, and I didn't get time to go through the example calculations very well. For that reason, I typed up some quick notes with reference information and a few example calculations. When we return to polarization (on 1 March), we'll do some analysis of more complex situations.

    Notes and such

    Prof. Hewitt at Dalhousie University has some nice notes on optics here. Lecture 34 is relevant for tomorrow, we'll be discussing polarization and learning how to calculate multi-component optical systems from Jones matrices.

    Basically, Jones matrices are similar to what you already know about vectors and rotations in 2D, general 'transformation matrices' that let you quickly calculate how polarized beams of light emerge from various optical components like polarizers. It is a lot like dealing with spin in quantum mechanics, which you'll see soon enough, but basically it is just rotating vectors.


    These notes of mine discuss rotation & (mirror) transformation matrices a little bit, enough to give you the idea.

    Monday, February 14, 2011

    Adaptive glasses

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/business/13novel.html?src=me&ref=homepage
    By the end of the semester, you should know how these work.

    Updated schedule/labs

    The Google calendar has been updated to reflect the revised schedule. We'll have a lecture on polarization tomorrow (so everyone comes to class, no lab) rather than geometric optics since Dr. Kung is out of town.

    Here's what the rest of Feb. and early March look like:

    15 Feb: Polarization 1 (8.1-6)
    17 Feb: Geometric optics 2 (B; 5.4-7); Lab 1: optics components (A)
    22 Feb: Geometric optics 3 (B, 6.1-4); Lab 2: refractive index (A)
    24 Feb: Geometric optics 3 (A, 6.1-4); Lab 2: refractive index (B)
    1 March: Polarization 2 (8.7-12)
    3 March: Exam 1

    Additionally, the syllabus will be updated shortly with the correct grading information. Here is the breakdown:

    Labs 15%
    Homework 15%
    Exams (2) 20% each = 40% total
    Final 30%

    For the labs, you may work on the reports together as a group, but you should all turn in individual reports.

    You can find the updated syllabus here (it is the same for PH and ECE).

    Saturday, February 12, 2011

    Week of Feb. 14, 2011

    Please note:

    - On Tuesday, Feb. 15, everyone meets in class.

    - On Thursday, Feb. 17, group A meets in the lab (Gallalee 322) while group B meets in the classroom.

    Hint (Hwk#3, Pb 7)

    In homework #3, problem #7, it asks you to show that the magnification is unchanged between the 2 situations:
    - either using only L1
    - or using the combination of L1 and L2, with L2 located at the focal point of L1.

    Now, what the problem does not tell you is: (i) which focal point of L1 the second lens is located at, and (ii) what the focal length of L2 is. That is where you need to think a little about the apparently "not so useful" hint about wearing eyeglasses. All of us have a positive lens in our eyes. Let us call it L1. When glasses are worn, one can either use a positive (far sighted) or a negative lens (short sighted) to bring the image focused onto the retina of the eye. What this means, is that the eyeglasses play the role of L2.

    Now this should help in solving this problem. As for (ii), the answer is actually independent of the focal length of L2.

    Do solve it in BOTH CASES, i.e. have TWO ray diagrams: L2 is positive and L2 is negative.

    Friday, February 11, 2011

    Blog layout fixed

    Somehow one of the last posts borked the blog layout, which made it somewhat challenging to read ... the offending html has been removed, and things should be more pleasant now.

    Thursday, February 10, 2011

    HW3 is out

    No class Thursday

    Since the University will not open until 10am, the optics class and lab are canceled today. A follow-up post will tell you how it is rescheduled.

    ----------
    A message from UNIVERSITY RELATIONS

    Based on current weather conditions in Tuscaloosa, the University will delay regular business operations until 10 a.m. on Thursday, Feb. 10. Although roadways in Tuscaloosa are passable, please check weather conditions on the roadways you travel to get to campus and make the best decision for your personal safety. Employees should call their supervisors if they are unable to work their regular schedule. The University strongly encourages each person to monitor weather updates from the National Weather Service and local media sources. Safety tips are posted at http://prepare.ua.edu/ and at http://www.fema.gov/hazard/winter/index.shtm.

    Monday, February 7, 2011

    Lab 1

    Here is lab 1. Remember that the labs are held in 322 Galallee, so on your lab day you should go there instead of Houser ...

    For those of you in group B, you'll do this lab tomorrow (Tues).
    For those of you in group A, you'll do this lab on Thursday.

    HW2 solutions

    Sorry for the delay, here are the HW2 solutions.

    Sunday, February 6, 2011

    Lab groups

    All. As a reminder, here is the final A/B group assignment:
    Group A=(Soner, Lee, Taurean, Taylor, Lucas, Joseph M, Ryan, Andrew, Kedrick)
    Group B=(Mohamad, Scott, Daniel, Jelani, Joseph L, Cory, Allen, Raed, Hakki)

    On Tuesday, Feb. 8, group A goes to class (Houser 311) and group B goes to the lab (Gallalee 322).
    On Thursday, Feb. 10, this is swapped: group A goes to the lab and group A goes to class.

    Thursday, January 27, 2011

    Online chat

    If you need more instant gratification than email or facebook messages can provide: (a) I usually leave my facebook chat on, (b) I'll start to leave my google chat on more regularly, (c) you can also find me at uaphysics on AIM.

    Don't worry that you are interrupting me. If I'm not available, I'll turn it off, or just not answer :-)

    Tuesday, January 25, 2011

    HW2 hints

    UPDATE: on number 3, you should get about 2.25m and 2.1m (not 2.6m and 2.1m).

    Some stray HW2 hints:

    (1) Draw a normal to the prism surface at the incident and exit points. Let θ1 be the incident angle (relative to the normal) and θ4 the exit angle. Let θ2,3be the refracted angles relative to the normal on the incident and exit sides, respectively. The deviation angle is then θ1-θ2+θ4-θ3.

    Use the triangle formed by the incident and exit rays and the apex (angle φ), all the angles sum to 180 deg. Apply Snell's law, and you're basically done. About 4.6deg.

    (2) Use (3.70) in the text. Presume the 2nd term under the radical is small compared to 1 (try to justify this), and note sqrt(1+x)~1+x/2 for x<<1.

    (3). The lateral position of the object is unchanged, only the depth is different. To see this, think about rays emanating from the object at the bottom of the well and trace them to the observer's eye. The apparent position is where the ray reaching the observer would extrapolate back to the horizontal position of the object.  About 2.25 and 2.1m, respectively.

    (4). Check out this figure. The angular rotation rate of the earth is ω=2π/86400s, and the angular deviation is δθ=ωδt. Double that for sunrise and sunset. About 160s.

    (5). Use the result of problem 1, noting by symmetry that θ1=θ4 and θ2=θ3.
    (6). Carry the sums through (i.e., you needn't bother just keeping the first term), but approximate to first order 1/(1-x)~1+x and sqrt(1+x)~1+x/2 for x<<1.
    (7). We'll do this one in class on Tuesday. The time it takes to cross a distance Δy in air is Δy/c. Crossing the same distance of glass means a time of nΔy/c. The difference between the two is the phase lag the observer sees, basically an offset in the observer's clock. Without the plate, the wave would be exp(iωt - y/c) to account for the frequency and propagation delay across a distance y.

    (8). We'll do this in class. Re-write n sin(θ) as a cross product on each side of Snell's law ...

    Friday, January 21, 2011

    Homework 1 solutions

    Homework 2 is out

    I know you're excited. Due 27 Jan before midnight.

    Rayleigh Scattering

    Here are some very short notes which corroborate our derivation today.
    And, here is something much fussier which ends up with the same result.

    Aside from the fact that your textbook says the same thing, of course, but if it is on the internet it must be true.

    Both of these are more than you need to know. The point of my posting them is to give some rationale for my writing a whole bunch of my own notes on radiation & scattering. Every treatment I found was either far, far too mathematically fussy to justify the only-approximately-correct result, or too hand-waving to be of much use. This is particularly true if you want to go further and derive black body radiation - the favorite derivation involves densities of states and mode counting, which is just unnecessarily obtuse. (FWIW, the Feynman lectures do a brilliant job, though you'll have to skip across all three volumes to get the details, and it is Purcell's ingenious derivation of the Larmor radiation formula that I followed in class.)

    Our approach was to take the middle ground: put in just enough physics to be dangerous, if we really need to be, but recognize that the basic question is "why is the sky blue" and not "how many watts are scattered per steradian per unit wavelength." And, the answer to the simple-sounding question is quite a bit more complicated than you thought, right? Only answering the more complicated-sounding question can obscure the fundamental understanding: we could have derived the scattering cross section in hideous detail, that doesn't tell you why the sky is blue. We'll come back to the complicated question later.

    Anyway: the main point is that we'll put in as much physics as we think we need, and not any more. If you want a 10% solution, that is a much different problem than wanting a 1% solution, so pick the battles that matter.

    (Recall what we did today: after determining the radiated power for an oscillating charge, we found the radiation reaction (Abraham-Lorentz) force that must be present (damping). Then we presumed small damping, so all we really did was figure out how a bound charge could be approximated as a simple harmonic oscillator with radiation damping, equivalent to an RLC circuit.)

    Thursday, January 20, 2011

    Hecht errata

    The list of errors Andrew pointed to is here.

    In addition, Andrew noted
    There appears to be an error in Hecht's book on page 651 in the magnetic equation of telegraphy (A1.20). The first equality sign should be a subtraction operator. This isn't noted on Chris Mack's errata sheet.
    I'll keep updating this post as we find more things. The solutions manual that accompanies the book is rife with errors, it is probably a losing battle to try and write all those down for the few (or none) of you that have it.

    Animations of moving charges

    Tuesday, January 18, 2011

    Another timely XKCD

    It wasn't like this, right?

    Today & Thursday's lectures

    Today's discussion of accelerated charges and radiation, and pretty much all of what we'll cover next time, can be found in these previously linked notes.

    Saturday, January 15, 2011

    Motivation

    Brilliant. You should have no trouble finishing your reading now.

    Thursday, January 13, 2011

    Wolfram Alpha

    Wolfram Alpha. Physics, math, etc. Incidentally, it will do definite integrals numerically, solve cubic equations, and other things useful for your upcoming homework sets.

    There is an iPhone app.

    Supplemental notes

    My PH102 notes, which includes a small bit of basic optics. (basic review)
    PH253 notes on radiation and scattering. (supplemental for next week's lectures)

    UGrad research conference

    RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITY CONFERENCE APPLICATIONS — Faculty are requested to remind undergraduate students of all majors that they are invited to enter UA’s annual Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity Conference scheduled for April 11 at the Bryant Conference Center. Students can compete for cash prizes and earn practical experience in defending or performing their work before judges. To participate, undergraduate students must register their projects by submitting application forms and abstracts describing their projects by March 7. Visit http://www.osp.ua.edu/UndergradResearch.html for an application and details.

    HW 1 is out

    Here is your first homework set. It basically covers the prerequisite material - while you may not know immediately how to do all of these problems, they should not be terribly mysterious after reading Ch. 2 and 3 of the Hecht textbook.

    Due 20 Jan 2011 at 11:59pm; we will cover some of these in class during next week's lectures.

    Wednesday, January 12, 2011

    Slides for lecture 1

    Here are the slides for the first lecture. They contain the basic course information, a quick review of vector calculus, and some supplemental information. The last ~half of the lecture will be on the whiteboard, a "review" of Maxwell's equations in free space.*

    It will be presumed that most of Ch. 2 in the Hecht textbook (wave motion) is somewhat familiar to you. The first HW set, posted shortly, will make sure of this.

    The second lecture will cover electromagnetic waves in more detail, and start our discussion of radiation. The third lecture will cover radiation from accelerated charges (dipole, synchrotron, thermal), and scattering & dispersion. At this point, you will know why the sky is blue.

    *It will be review if you have had PH331 or ECE340. If you have only had PH106 it will only be review for a little while, but you'll be OK.

    Tuesday, January 4, 2011

    Syllabus, schedule

    Some general course information:

    PH syllabus, ECE syllabus (they are essentially the same)
    detailed course schedule (duplicated on the course calendar)

    Welcome to optics!

    This is where you will find all the information you need for PH495/ECE493/ECE593 for the Spring 2011 semester.

    In another day or two, I will have the syllabus, schedule, and some other details posted ... for now, you can review the course calendar, embedded at the bottom of the page or using the link on the right.